The dangers of nuclear tests


studycommittee.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

nuclear asymmetric
laser evolution
their dealing

Should a Global Climate Agreement Hold the US to a Higher Environmental Standard

Yes, the US should be held to a higherPresident's requested budget and the
environmental standard than the rest of thesuggested Green Budget, but one would suspect
world. We have benefited from a superiorthat the Green Budget is closer to our needs
economic growth powered by consumption of aif we wish to assume a leadership role in
major share of the world's fossil fuels,environmental  standards.
causing a major share of the world's
environmental pollution. We are technicallyClimate change is the major issue within the
equipped to lead toward a higherCongress and should present a major showdown
environmental standard. Currently, however,on the proposed energy budget. Democrats and
it would be a major challenge for the US toRepublicans in both the House and Senate are
assume this leadership role. We will have todrafting major bills to reduce greenhouse gas
wait for a new administration that,emission through "cap and trade" systems.
hopefully,  will  want  this  role  for  us.These bills would make billions of dollars to
stimulate development of cleaner energy
The Bush administration has continued tosources. The major presidential contenders
reject actions to reduce global warmingfor the upcoming election, Democratic
pollution. It has refused to require cuts inSenators Clinton and Obama and Republican
heat-trapping carbon dioxide pollution,Senator McCain, also support the "cap and
significantly raise fuel economytrade" systems. In addition, Senator Clinton
requirements, or hold companies accountablewants to tighten fuel economy standards more
for improving their energy efficiency usingthan Congress did last year so that an
wind, solar and other renewable energyaverage vehicle will go 55 miles per gallon
sources.by 2030. Senator McCain sees nuclear power as
a big part of the environmental pollution
In his final FY2009 budget request, Presidentsolution.
Bush accurately reflected his
administration's low priority forAggressive environmental leadership should
environmental help. Again, President Bushemerge from the upcoming Presidential
stripped critical funds protecting America'selection. However, it will take the strong
communities and natural resources, andand concerted efforts of the future President
instead rewarded dirty industries. All ofand Congress to move the USA to the forefront
this followed his State of the Union Addressof environmental standards. There is a great
touting his commitment to advance clean,watershed between the mainstream technologies
renewable resources and reduce dependence onthat make up the modern energy industry and
oil. A quote from President Bush' speech onthe newer "clean" technologies that offer an
energy was "The United States is committed toalternative, low carbon path to the future.
strengthening our energy security andThis watershed encompasses costs, technology,
confronting global climate change. And thematurity and scale of existing energy
best way to meet these goals is for Americainfrastructure.
to continue leading the way toward the
development of cleaner and moreIt is not enough to ask our new president to
energy-efficient  technology".lead us into a new role of energy leadership.
With today's known conditions, there are two
Despite the president's more aggressiveimmediate future major hurdles that will have
statements on fighting climate change, histo be overcome to continue to a leadership
budget request would reduce funding forrole. The first hurdle is the slowing of the
energy efficiency and renewable energy suchUS economy. We suspect that the economy will
as wind, solar, etc. The president gets muchslow and possibly go into recession in late
of that reduction by slashing funding from2008 and 2009. This poor economy could slow
$280 million to $60 million for low-incomeinvestments into renewable energies and
households to "weatherize" their homes withpostpone the momentum that the US currently
new windows, better insulation and otherhas  in  adopting  renewable  energy.
efforts. As a frame of reference, the Green
Budget, which is used in Congress' budgetThe second hurdle is congress' failure to
deliberations, recommends a FY2009renew energy-incentive tax credits that lapse
Weatherizating budget of $300 millionat the end of 2008. A new economic study by
dollars. On average, the Department of EnergyNavigant Consulting finds that over 116,000
has stated that weatherization reducesUS jobs and nearly $19 billion in US
heating bills by 31 percent and overallinvestments could be lost in just one year if
energy bills by $358 per year. The total 2009energy tax credits are not renewed by
request for Office of Energy Efficiency andCongress. It is a full agenda for a new
Renewable Energy, a major Department ofPresident just to position the United States
Energy agency, is $1.255 billion, a 27to account for and reduce its own
percent cut from the 2008 level of $1.722environmental pollution. To achieve a
billion. The Green Budget recommendation forleadership role would be a great
the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewableaccomplishment and one that I hope that we
Energy is $81 Billion Dollars. One wouldwill witness.
anticipate major differences between the



1 A B C 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90