The dangers of nuclear tests


studycommittee.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

nuclear attack
WORLD WAR DISADVANTAGES energy
Advantages Disadvantages Single Parent nuclear power + disadvantages
disadvantages of nuclear bomb pros and gons of nuclear energy
pros of nuclear energy feedback
atomic bomb pros and cons Atomic Bomb Pictures
What are the disadvantages to nuclear diavantages to nuclear power

He Will Confirm A Covenant With Many...the U.S.- Israel Strategic Alliance - Part II

The U.S.-Israel Strategic Dialogue is beingLet us turn aside, for a moment, shall we, to
propelled by Iran's nuclear program andobserve the unvarnished historicity of U.S.
absurdities coming from the mouth of itsPresidential aspirations towards Israel . . .
president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Now the U.S.for in this incredible glimpse into the
and  Israel  have  little  choice  .  .  .ever-maturing "strategic relationship"
between the U.S. and Israel, it has always
"Strategic Dialogue" talks between the U.S.been her Presidents who have led the way-it
and Israel-were commenced in earnest at theis the privilege of the American Executive to
end of November, 2005 (U.S. State Dept.orchestrate U.S. foreign policy, and more so,
Bulletin). These "talks" are propelled tosince two World Wars and the Cold War have
their inevitable conclusion (i.e., thegiven birth to the Imperial Presidency; make
U.S.-ISRAEL DEFENSE PACT/TREATY) by Iran'sno  mistake  to  the  contrary!
preposterous charges this past week: No
Jewish Holocaust under Hitler; Israel is aIt is this profound political significance
"Zionist-European Tumor" which, ipso facto,between American Presidents and Israel that
should be excised from the Middle East andastounds the world's diplomats and
transplanted into Germany-Austria; and, "no,negotiators-especially, European and Moslem
we're not making a Weapon of Massobservers. Understanding the evolution of
Destruction, even though 'Israel must bethe American Imperium and its unusual, yet
wiped  off  the  map!"  (My  conjectures.)clearly observable relationship, between its
Chief Executive and Israel's security, is
Historic revisionism is alive andmost remarkable-to obfuscate this
well-therefore, do not conclude that thisunparalleled association (as some religious
series on the "Strategic and Eschatologicaland secular observers are loathe to
Imperatives" embedded in the U.S.-Israeldo)-damages the academic and so-called
Defense Pact (upcoming) is as naïve as youspiritual credentials of those who deny this
may have surmised (i.e., pure speculation andobvious  arrangement!
benignly obscure Christian fundamentalism
gone amok). Israel's audaciousPresident  Harry  S.  Truman
materiality-in spite of the Adolf
Hitler-Grand Mufti, Haj Mohammed AminPresident Truman, whose Baptist roots
Al-Husseini original Axis of Evil-mocks thepredisposed him to Israel's rebirth as a
secular outrage toward Zionism and declaresnation state for the Jews, commenced a long
heretical the blather, and hyper symbolism ofand ever-deepening relationship between the
Biblical  liberalism! (Palestinefacts.org)State  of  Israel  and  the  USA.
There are forces like those written hereunderTruman's predecessor, President Franklin D.
which make the heralding of Daniel theRoosevelt, appeared to be sympathetic to the
Prophet's final week of Gentile World PowerJewish cause (i.e., the State of Israel in
all the more irreversible and propheticallyPalestine); however, his assurances to the
intrusive, in spite of the mockers-bothArabs that the United States would not
secular and religious-who claim theseintervene without consulting both parties
prognostications are fantasy, or just plaincaused public uncertainty about his position.
fear-mongering among theological misfits who
still claim the Bible has something to sayPresident Harry S. Truman, on the other hand
about  where  this  world's  heading!after taking office, made it clear that his
sympathies were with the Jews; hence, he
"They've been wrong before-let them prattleaccepted the Balfour Declaration (made by the
about their future Antichrist all they want .British as a quid pro quo for Jewish support
. . it's relatively harmless . . . besides,for the Allied cause in World War I),
who's listening; who cares . . .in any event,explaining that it was in keeping with former
the Millerites, Mormons, Jehovah WitnessesPresident Woodrow Wilson's principle of "self
and wacko-Christian fundamentalists like Haldetermination."
Lindsey et al, have always dabbled in the
ethereal world of prophetical make believeIn point of fact, Daniel Pipes, in his review
and  we're  still  here,  aren't  we?"of Michael T. Benson's book Harry S. Truman
and  the  Founding  of  Israel  states:
Friend . . . you'd better get a grip . . .
things are changing, faster than you had any"Benson proves that Truman's policies
idea . . . and their "prophetical alignment"resulted not from nose-counting (the "Jewish
does not bode well for a world utterlyvote" in America) but from deeply-held
unprepared for what's driving the personalitybeliefs. His pro-Israel outlook 'was based
behind: "HE SHALL CONFIRM A COVENANT (i.e.,primarily on humanitarian, moral, and
"Treaty")  WITH  THE  MANY..." (Daniel 9:27).sentimental grounds, many of which were an
outgrowth of the president's religious
As  Winston  Churchill  once  said:upbringing and his familiarity with the
Bible.' Extensive research into Truman's
"We reject with scorn all these learned andbiography and earlier career shows his
laboured myths that Moses was but a legendaryimpressive consistency. Benson, of the
figure. We believe that the most scientificUniversity of Utah, establishes Truman as a
view, the most up to date and rationalisticstudious child and deeply religious young man
conception, will find its fullestwho, when he unexpectedly found himself in
satisfaction in taking the Bible literally.the Oval Office, lived faithfully by his
We may be sure that all these things happenedprecepts. In the case at hand, he expressed
as they are set out in Holy Writ. In thesympathy for Zionism as early as 1939 and
words of a forgotten work of Mr. Gladstone,reiterated his views many times
we rest with assurance upon 'the impregnablesubsequently."  (Palestinefacts.org)
rock of Holy Scripture...' Let the men of
science and of learning expand theirTruman initiated several studies of the
knowledge and probe with their researchesPalestine situation that supported his belief
every detail of the records which have beenthat, as a result of the Holocaust, Jews were
preserved to us from these dim ages. All theyoppressed and also in need of a homeland.
do is to fortify the grand simplicity andNotwithstanding Truman's support for the
essential accuracy of the recorded truthsJewish state, and throughout both the
which have lighted so far the pilgrimage ofRoosevelt and Truman administrations, the
man."Departments of War and State, recognizing the
possibility of a Soviet-Arab connection and
THE  PRINCE  OF  PERSIAthe potential Arab restriction on oil
supplies to the United States, advised
When I published my article "Behold, theagainst U.S. intervention on behalf of the
Prince of Persia" (buzzle.com, June 2005),Jews.
there were fears that a "Nuclear Iran" would
galvanize Radical Islam and stiffen theBritain and the United States, in a joint
insurgency in Iraq, compel a "democraticeffort to examine the dilemma, established
takeover" of secular Middle East nations likethe "Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry." In
Egypt and Turkey, and drive Israel (and forApril 1946, the committee submitted
that matter the U.S.) to the brink of arecommendations that Palestine not be
unilateral-preemptive strike at Iraniandominated by either Arabs or Jews. It
nuclear facilities. Likewise, because of theconcluded that attempts to establish
Iranian-Syrian Defense Pact (early 2005),nationhood or independence would result in
Syria and the Palestinian Authority, wouldcivil strife; that a trusteeship agreement
find themselves pouring into the "cup ofaimed at bringing Jews and Arabs together
trembling to all the nations 'round about"should be established by the United Nations;
Israel.that full Jewish immigration be allowed into
Palestine; and that two autonomous states be
Well, we stand on our "prophetic laurels" andestablished with a strong central government
declare the rise of the "Prince of Persia" isto control Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and the
all the more enraged through the election andNegev, the southernmost section of Palestine.
regime of one, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
(President of Iran since August 3, 2005) . .British, Arab, and Jewish reactions to the
. consider this, as the world continues torecommendations  were  not  favorable.
spin upon this precarious axis of inscrutible
uncertainty  .  .  .In spite of his own Departments of War and
State, and of the Brits subterfuge regarding
Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of the Atomicthe Jewish State, he immediately recognized
Energy Organization of Iran, Dec. 10, 2005,the Jewish State upon their declaration of
told the newly-awarded Nobel Prize winner,independence-eleven minutes after Israel's
Mohamed El-Baradei, that his comments todeclaration of statehood (American Heritage).
persuade Iran to stop its uranium enrichment
program (because its heading toward a nuclearThis "Presidential Recognition" was,
explosion in either Jerusalem or Tel Aviv)according to Margaret Truman (daughter of
the following not-so-ambiguous-mafia-soundingPresident Truman), "the most difficult
remarks: "He (El-Baradei) knows Iran has notdecision (he) ever faced as president"
diverted in its nuclear program . . . it(Christian Science Monitor). The immediate
would be better for him not to have manyinvolvement of the President of the United
interviews."  (Comcast  Netnews)States-overruling his powerful Secretary of
State George Marshall-set a precedence
The Iranians, with diplomatic hubris,wherein the Presidency and Israel became
simultaneously suggested, through Foreignsynonymous in diplomatic parlance. In other
Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi that thewords: The President of the United
U.S. participates in Iran's nuclear programStates-not the nation, per se (i.e.,
to wit: "America can take part inLegislative or Judicial branches of
international bidding for the construction ofgovernment), nor its State Department-became
Iran's nuclear power plant if they observethe deciding factor and the fulcrum of the
the  basic  standards  and  quality."relationship  between  Israel  and  the  USA.
All this during the same week (December 3-10,"Administrative tension" between the U.S.
2005) in which these not so subtle remarksState Department and the President,
were made by the ever-more-resembling theespecially in regards to Israel vis-à-vis
coordinator of the American Iranian HostageU.S. national interest throughout the Middle
Crisis, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:East, and in particular the acquisition of
cheap energy in maintenance of America's
"Some European Countries insist on sayingever-expanding economy, is of no small
that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jewsnotoriety; yet, provides ample wiggle room
in furnaces and they insist on it to thewhen the President wishes to register
extent that if anyone proves somethingconsternation if the Executive perceives
contrary to that they condemn that person andIsrael  "has  gone  too  far."
throw them in jail . . . although we (i.e.,
the Iranians) don't accept this claim (i.e.,President  Dwight  Eisenhower
the Holocaust-six million Jews perishing in
Hitler's death camps), if we suppose it (theWith the decline of Britain as the
Holocaust) is true, our question for theself-appointed protector of the Middle East,
Europeans is: Is the killing of innocentand the rise of the Cold War, America's
Jewish people by Hitler the reason for theirimmediate, though periferal role with Israel,
support to the occupiers of Jerusalem?" (Paulwas about to change-and change significantly.
Hughes,  Reuters,  Dec.  8,  2005)
Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser seized the Suez
Of course, all this was compounded byCanal in October of 1956-whereupon Britain,
President-American-Hostage-Leader AhmadinejadFrance and Israel (as co-conspirators)
suggesting that Israeli Jews be transplantedlaunched a surprise attack; but, Ike
to provinces in both Germany and Austria toconsidered the bizarre adventure as a
salve the conscience of their Nazi past. How"mid-Victorian  form  of  gunboat diplomacy."
fitting that all these remarks were made at
the summit of the Organization of Islamic"I've just never seen great powers make such
Conference held in the Muslim holy city ofa complete mess and botch of things" -
Mecca  in  Saudi  Arabia!October  30,  1956  (President  Eisenhower).
Naturally, the U.S.-Israeli reaction wasIt was the President of the United States who
vehement, especially after the October, 2005torpedoed the tripartite effort against an
"Israel must be wiped off the map" remarks ofArab nation and won him, at the time, the
Mr.  Ahmadinejad  (The  Tribulation Network):praise of the UN and as the defender of
third-world nations against Israel and the
"I hope that these outrageous remarks will beWest.
a wake-up call to people who have any
illusions about the nature of the regime inThe upshot of Suez, in so far as the
Iran" (Israeli foreign ministry spokesmanU.S.-Israel "Strategic Relationship" is
Mark Regev)." . . . an outrageous gaffe,concerned-made the U.S. the dominant player
which I want to repudiate in the sharpestin the Middle East, and, ipso facto,
manner"  (President  George  Bush).intimately involved with Israel.
Furthermore, it brought the Cold War smack
Finally, the bottom line remarks of Whitedab  into  the  midst  of  the  Middle  East.
House  spokesman  Scott  McClellan:
"The affair (Suez) convinced Eisenhower that
"It just further underscores our concernsa move into the area by the Soviet Union
about the regime in Iran. And it's all thewould be disastrous to Europe and Nation,
more reason why it's so important that thebecause of oil needs. He announced the
regime not have the ability to developEisenhower Doctrine: The U.S. would send
nuclear  weapons."weapons and cash to any Mideast nation
threatened by communism" (Christian Science
Just how outrageous were Mr. Ahmadinejad'sMonitor  10/26/2001).
remarks?
There's no doubt that the USA was supporting
"So, Germany and Austria, come and give one,Israel from the get-go (not just Arab states
two or any number of your privinces to theopposed to communism) . . . but then came . .
Zionist regime so they can create a country.
there . . . and the problem will be solved at
its root . . . you oppressed them, so give aPresidents John F. Kennedy/Lyndon Johnson and
part of Europe to the Zionist regime . . .Richard  Nixon
why do they insist on imposing themselves
(the Europeans) on other powers and creatingStrategic cooperation accelerated with John
a tumour (Israel) so there is always tensionKennedy's 1962 sale of HAWK antiaircraft
and  conflict?"missiles to Israel-again, over the objection
of  the  "Arabist"  State  Department.
Now, Scott McClellan's "all the more reason
why it's so important that the regime notAfter Israel's smashing military victory in
have the ability to develop nuclear weapons"1967 and capture of the Siani, Golan Heights
and the innocuous subtrafuge of the U.S.and West Bank-as well as the old city of
State Department's remarks regarding theJerusalem-Presidents Johnson and Nixon became
U.S.-Israel Strategic Dialogue to wit, "Theconvinced that the Arabs were not capable of
United States and Israel look forward toattacking  Israel  for  many  years.
continuing this dialogue in the Spring of
2006 in Israel"-demands further "strategicA policy of quantitative military equlibrium
dialogue."was in place in the early '60s wherein Lyndon
Johnson would provide Israel with tanks and
Trust me-unless you're in the market for aaircraft, but would balance these sales by
hot bridge deal-these U.S.-Israeli Strategictransference of the same to Arab countries.
Dialogue discussions have not only commenced,This policy would inhibit any one state from
they have only intensified as a result of thegaining the military advantage over the
bombastic absurdities of Iran, along with theother. This all changed in 1968 when Johnson
rhetoric and actions of Hezbollah, Hamas,committed Phantom jets to Israel. In so
Islamic Jihad, and the acceleration of thedoing, he established the USA as the
insurgency in Iraq against Bush's War onoverwhelming arms supplier of Israel and
Terror.moved the geopolitical equation from
quantitative  to  Israel's qualitative favor.
The worst fighting in five years between
Hezbollah and the IDF took place at the endIndeed, Johnson's Baptist upbringing affirmed
of November, 2005. This was preceded by ahis  pro-Israel  posture:
coordinated meeting between Iran's foreign
minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, and leaders of"Most if not all of you (speaking to an
Hamas (Khaled Meshaal), a deputy leader ofAmerican Jewish audience) have very deep ties
Islamic Jihad, and Ahmed Jibril, the leaderwith the land and with the people of Israel,
of the Popular Front for the Liberation ofas I do, for my Christian faith sprang from
Palestine. Jibril's "organic remarks" tieyours . . . the Bible stories are woven into
Iran into the recent assaults in Northernmy childhood memories as the gallant struggle
Israel and the suicide bombing of a shoppingof modern Jews to be free of persecution is
mall in Israel's Netanya where five Israelialso woven into our souls" (Jewish Virtual
citizens  were  killed  .  .  .Library).
"We will confirmed that what is going on inAt this point Israel did not significantly
occupied Palestine is organically connectedcontribute to "Western defenses" in the
to what is going on in Iraq, Syria, Iran andregion because its potential to contribute to
Lebanon"  (Jibril)  (ICH  12/12/05)a policy of containment was negligible.
However, that perception changed when the USA
All this in light of Hamas' most recentcalled upon Israel to buttress King Hussein's
victories  at  the  polls  .  .  .government and oust the Syrians from their
incursion  into  Jordan  in  1970.
"NABLUS, West Bank - Hamas supporters on
Friday celebrated a landslide electionNixon, continued the policies initiated by
victory in major West Bank towns, theJohnson, however, it is well known that his
strongest sign yet of the Islamic militantaffection towards Israel was at best
group's growing political appeal ahead ofsuperficial and, for that matter, his
Jan. 25 parliamentary elections. Israelpredisposition toward being downright
responded with concern, saying a Palestiniananti-Semitic in his private conversations
government dominated by Hamas-which calls for(William F. Buckley, Nixon and Anti-Semitism
Israel's destruction and has killed hundredson the Right, Feb. 10, 1997, National Review)
of Israelis in attacks- would not be aultimately led, as some surmise, to Israel's
partner for peace. Thousands of Hamashorrific losses during the 1973 Yom Kippur
supporters joined victory marches afterWar in which Egypt and Syria sought to regain
Friday prayers. In Jenin, where Hamas won aland  lost  in  the  '67  War.
majority of local council seats, marchers
chanted, 'To Jerusalem we march, martyrs byNotwithstanding, Nixon came to Israel's
the millions!' and held up copies of therescue and played nuclear brinkmanship with
Quran." (AP, Ali Daraghmeh, Associated Pressthe Soviets, putting them on notice by
Writer,  Dec.  17,  2005).declaring a worldwide nuclear alert to
prevent their intervention on the side of the
UNIT 262, THE F-15I STRATEGIC 69 SQUADRON vs.Arab belligerents. From here the world would
TOR-M1witness, for the first time, a new USA
involvement into the Middle East cauldron:
As Lebanon, Syrian, Iran and the PalestinianThe  Peace  Initiatives  .  .  .
Authority ratchet up the "War on Israel" -
Israel  has  plans  of  their  own  .  .  .President  Jimmy  Carter
Uzi Mahnaimi of Tel Aviv and Sarah Baxter ofUnder Carter (1974-1979) a time of de facto
the Times Newspapers Ltd. (London) quote astrategic cooperation prevailed wherein
senior White House source saying that theIsrael was allowed to sell military equipment
nuclear threat from Iran was moving to theto the U.S. and, for the first time, joint
"top of the international agenda and themilitary  exercises  were  held  by  the two.
issue  now  was  'What  next?'"
It is here that the "Man of Peace" enters
PM Ariel Sharon quipped: "Israel-and notinto  the  fray.
only Israel-cannot accept a nuclear Iran."
Sure sounds like the U.S.-Israel Strategic"Consider the Camp David accords-still the
Alliance  on  parade  here!most important Middle East pact to which the
U.S. has served as midwife. President Jimmy
The IDF has placed its military readiness onCarter had taken office promising a new look
"G" alert-the highest stage. Israel is nowfor U.S. foreign policy. The hard
on the highest military alert to prepare forrealpolitik of the Nixon-Ford era, when
an  attack  against  Iran!everything was seen through the lens of the
cold war, would be modified. In its place
Israel firmly asserts that by the end ofwould be an attempt to deal with regional
March, 2006, things in Iran, and ipso factoproblems on their own terms. In the Middle
Israel, will have reached the "POINT OF NOEast, that meant a comprehensive approach to
RETURN!" UNIAEA head, Mohamed El-Baradei,Israeli-Arab differences, including some sort
will present his next report on Iran'sof solution for the problem of displaced
nuclear  intentions  in  early  March,  2006.Palestinians."  (CSMonitor)
A massive Israeli intelligence probe ofThe point to be made in all of Carter's
Iran's nuclear capabilities, launched from adeliberations is the injection of the
site in northern Iraq (no doubt in"Comprehensive Peace Factor" into the
cooperation with the USA) has alreadyequation-it was and is the USA that is at the
identified uranium enrichment siteshelm of such peace initiatives; specifically,
previously unknown to the IAEA-there could beit is the President of the United States
up to 50 sites in Iran coordinating theAmerica that is the prime factor, the pivotal
uranium enrichment program to produce afigure  in  any  and  all  such negotiations.
nuclear bomb capable of hitting Tel Aviv
Jerusalem.In solidarity with his Baptist roots, Jimmy
Carter's  support  for Israel was unwavering:
Israel's top Special Forces Brigade, Unit
262, and their F-15I strategic 69 Squadron,"(I) believed very deeply that the Jews who
will ready themselves for a non-stophad survived the Holocaust deserved their own
roundtrip to deliver both air and groundnation, and that they had a right to live in
devastation to Iran's threats to wipe Israelpeace among their neighbors. I considered
off  the  map.this homeland for the Jews to be compatible
with the teaching of the Bible, hence
This will be all the more difficult if Iranordained by God. These moral and religious
secures delivery of a $1B anti-ballisticbeliefs made my commitment to the security of
missile system (the Tor-M1) from theIsrael  unshakable."  (Carter's  memoirs)
Russians. The system is designed to destroy
guided missiles and laser-guided bombs fromNotwithstanding Carter's pro-Israel
aircraft-likewise, the system can be easilysentiments, he, like virtually all of the
and  quickly  installed!  (ICH  12/12/2005)U.S. Presidents, have expressed-beneath the
veneer of solidarity with Israel-reservations
Note also: Original Source: The Times ofto one degree or another, especially in
London,  Dec.  11,  2005)response to the "Jewish lobby" (i.e., AIPAC)
in meddling with the perceived national
"HE  WILL  CONFIRM  THE  TREATY"interests of the USA.



1 A B C 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90