The dangers of nuclear tests


studycommittee.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

nuclear defense
solar what is the point of undergroung nuclear
Nuclear Tests on Humans What are the current effects from the
list pros cons alternative power about nuclear test drawbacks
atomic stress test  

Analysts: Agreement at Korean Nuclear Talks Will Not Be Easy

In Beijing, the six-party talks on Norththis week, chief U.S. negotiator Christopher
Korea's nuclear-weapons program have resumed.Hill said the Bush administration had no
plans  to  attack  North  Korea.
The United States has been saying since
October 2002 that Pyongyang has a secretExperts also say Pyongyang is looking for
nuclear-weapons program. Since then, Northeconomic incentives in exchange for nuclear
Korea has pulled out of the Nucleardisarmament. Mr. Kimball says the United
Non-Proliferation Treaty, expelled U.N.States wants something else from North Korea.
monitors, and re-opened a nuclear facility it
had  promised  to  dismantle  in  1994."For the North Koreans to announce that they
are going to dismantle their nuclear-weapons
Jim Walsh is a nuclear expert from Harvardcapacity, to freeze their current activities
University says very little is known aboutin a verifiable fashion, both in terms of
North Korea's program to build nucleartheir plutonium activities and their possible
weapons.uranium-enrichment activities and then allow
for the dismantlement of their nuclear
"It is not a very transparent place.facilities that can be used to produce
International Atomic Energy Agency inspectorsnuclear bomb material or nuclear weapons," he
have not been there for some time. But whatsaid.
is known from the past, is that they had a
reactor that could produce plutonium, thatMr. Kimball says a key sticking point in the
could reprocess plutonium and with thatnegotiations is what is called "sequencing",
plutonium, construct nuclear weapons," hewhat comes first, North Korea's disarmament
said. "On February 10 of this year, the Northor economic incentives from neighboring
Korean government issued an announcementstates?
saying that they had nuclear weapons: that
was their first public pronouncement of that"The North Koreans want all the benefits up
kind, although they had been telling us andfront and they would like to dismantle later.
others privately four months prior to thatAnd what the United States has been has been
that they did in fact have a quote 'nuclearinsisting on, up to this point, basically, is
deterrent' unquote. But the estimates arefor the North Koreans to announce that they
uncertain, ranging anywhere from zero nuclearare going to dismantle and to begin doing so
weapons to maybe six to eight nuclearand then to consider providing some of the
weapons, but frankly, not a lot is known.benefits the North Koreans are looking for,"
They have not tested a nuclear weapon, sohe explained. "So I think to put it crudely,
there  is  not  a  lot  of  data  out there."bluntly, simply - one of the key, if not the
key, issue for the two sides to resolve is
For the past several years, the United Statesthe  sequencing  of  these  steps."
has been trying to persuade North Korea to
eliminate its nuclear-weapons capabilities.Harvard University's Jim Walsh, who has
That effort has been conducted through therecently met with North Korean nuclear
negotiating forum known as the six-partyofficials in Pyongyang, says there is another
talks that bring together the United States,key factor that will determine the success or
China, Russia, Japan, South Korea, and Northfailure  of  these  talks.
Korea.
"The real issue here, the more general issue
Since August 2003, diplomats from the sixis an issue of seriousness. And the North
countries met three times with very littleKoreans wonder whether the United States is
progress achieved. Now, after a 13-monthreally serious or whether it is talking for
hiatus, the parties are meeting again in anthe sake of talking, for diplomatic advantage
effort  to  try  to move the process forward.or to buy time," said Mr. Walsh. "For their
part, American officials wonder whether the
Experts say it will not be easy to reconcileNorth Koreans are serious, whether they are
two  conflicting  negotiating  positions.just talking for the sake of talking in order
to get aid or other assistance. And so while
"What is clear from the historical record, isI do not expect at this week's talks for
that what North Korea seems to be looking forthere to be a major breakthrough - I do not
is a resolution to the long-standing 'stateexpect the difficult issues to be resolved. I
of war' that technically and legally stilldo hope, though, that each side is able to
exists between North Korea and the Unitedcommunicate to the other, in a credible way,
States," said Daryl Kimball, who heads thethat they are serious and want real
Arms Control Association, an independentnegotiations."
research organization. "This is why they have
from time to time said that they seek someAnalysts say if these talks fail, the United
form of peace treaty with the United States,States may call for economic and political
to formally end the Korean War. They also,sanctions against North Korea, including
related to that, have stated that they arereferring the matter to the United Nations
looking for guarantees that the United StatesSecurity Council. Experts say that would
will  not  attack the regime or the country."result in an unfortunate escalation of the
crisis with unforeseen consequences for
During the opening round of talks earliereveryone.



1 A B C 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90