The dangers of nuclear tests


studycommittee.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

nuclear energy
virus  

Potential for Progress in New North Korea Nuclear Talks Uncertain

After more than a year of stalling, Northgiving  economic  and  security  incentives.
Korea has agreed to resume negotiations about
its nuclear weapons programs next week inPyongyang wants formal pledges from
Beijing. But experts and officials note thisWashington that it would not attack the North
is  the  easy  step.in addition to massive aid. Pyongyang has
cited a number of reasons and rationales for
After the good news about the resumption ofrefusing to negotiate, including a charge
disarmament talks come the big questions. Howthat the United States retains a "hostile
much progress will there be? How long mightattitude."
it take to reach agreement? Ultimately, will
North Korea ever abandon nuclear weaponsShi Yinhong, a professor of international
completely?relations at China's People's University in
Beijing, says resolution of this conflict
The United States, Japan, South Korea, Chinadepends on compromise by North Korean leader
and Russia have been urging North Korea sinceKim Jong Il and President Bush. "Even if the
2003 to give up its nuclear weapons programs,six-party talks get started this month, I
which were developed in violation ofpersonally feel that prospects for the final
international  agreements.settlement are quite bleak," he said. "Will
Kim Jong Il be willing to give up his nuclear
Then last year, after three rounds ofarms programs? Will the United States change
inconclusive six-nation talks in Beijing,its  fundamental  position?"
North Korea abandoned the process, announced
it already possessed nuclear weapons, and -Historically, experts note North Korea has
at one point - implied it might be preparingdragged out negotiations as long as possible,
to  test  them.adapting hostile and conciliatory tones in
turn, to see which tactic works and in order
Intense diplomatic consultation and someto extract as many concessions as possible.
economic inducements from South Korea appearPark Young-ho, a senior research fellow at
to have brought North Korea back to thethe Korea Institute of National Unification,
table. But what will be the benefits of moresays this pattern is at play now. "North
negotiations? Many experts say there are fewKorea has calculated what they can get from
options beyond talks. But some - likethe United States. But their tactics have not
Professor Bruce Cumings, a North Koreasucceeded in inducing concessions from the
scholar at the University of Chicago - warnUnited States," he said. "That's why they
that prolonging talks only seems to benefitreturned  to  the  talks."
North  Korea.
Analysts say the promise of energy that the
"If the six-party talks don't work then NorthNorth desperately needs could make a
Korea would have gained some time to makedifference. Electricity, along with tons of
more nuclear weapons," said Professorfertilizer and food aid, are vital to the
Cumings. "We'll still be in a very dangeroussurvival of the impoverished communist
situation, and the re-division of this regionnation.
along lines like back in the Cold War would
continue."In June last year, the United States offered
to provide an energy package to the North in
The current nuclear crisis erupted in Octoberexchange for disarmament. The details of the
2002, when the United States said North Koreaoffer have not been made public, but U.S.
had admitted to running a secret,Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says the
uranium-based nuclear program in violation ofoffer  is  still  on  the  table.
a  1994  agreement.
On top of that, South Korea last week
Under that deal, a Japanese, South Korean andunilaterally offered to send huge amounts of
U.S. consortium was to supply fuel oil andelectricity across the border into the North
build light-water safe reactors in the North.in exchange for disarmament. South Korean
In exchange, Pyongyang agreed to close itsofficials say the proffered electricity would
Soviet-built nuclear plants, capable ofreplace the power plants North Korea would
producing plutonium to convert into nuclearhave received under the failed 1994
weapons  fuel.agreement, giving it access to sufficient
energy  within  a  few  short  years.
But construction of the light-water reactors
was slow. Pyongyang argued the United StatesThat still may not be enough to convince Kim
was failing to meet its obligations, not onlyJong Il. Chun Hong Chan, a politics professor
on energy but also on a pledge to move towardat Busan University, says Pyongyang is
normalizing U.S.-North Korean diplomaticunlikely to let Seoul control its electricity
relations. Washington maintains that thesupply. He also says the North is unlikely to
North Koreans have been reneging on the 1994give up the one thing - nuclear weapons -
agreement from the start, and never intendedthat gives it any leverage over its enemies.
to give up their nuclear weapons development."If North Korea renounces its nuclear
programs for good, it means it cannot use the
Since the dispute became public, the Northcard anymore, and I don't think a country
has expelled United Nations nuclearlike North Korea will give up that card for
inspectors, pulled out of the nucleargood,"  he  said.
Non-Proliferation Treaty, and threatened to
build more weapons. Name-calling and insultsDespite the lack of certainty, experts say
between  the  two  sides  have  intensified.the offers on the table form a good basis for
serious negotiations. If an agreement is
Now, the Bush administration wants Northreached, however, another serious question
Korea to "completely, verifiably andarises: can all sides be trusted to deliver
irreversibly" dismantle its nuclear programson what they promise?
- both uranium and plutonium-based - before



1 A B C 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90